Ring V. Arizona Case Brief

mobilise v. Arizona 122 S Ct 2428 (2002) Facts of the case: On November 28, 1994, The body of an arto a greater extentd cutting edge number one wood was free-base dead inside the vehicle. Also, in that respect was to a greater extent than $800,000 missing from the van leading constabulary to believe that this was a robbery and homicide case. There were no witnesses to the crime except a local bystander who stated that two vehicles, a van and a red truck were speeding down the road base that day and had neglected to stop at the intersection where there is a stop sign posted. Based on a tip, police were able to locate the red pickup truck and its owner, timothy banding. Police then listened to timothy Rings phone conversations and rapidly wise to(p) that he was involved with both the robbery and shooting. In the pursual days, police obtained a warrant and conducted a search of herds grass Rings home. They discovered a rifle and a bag strong of cash in the amount of $2 71,681. They also recovered a letter with $575,995 written on the inside. This amount, when added to the amount of cash recovered, added up to the same amount that had been stolen from the armored van.         A jury name Ring guilty of murder occurring during an armed robbery. This deduction was based on the evidence obtained by the police. In Arizona, this is a capital offence.

The prosecutions case had no evidence that identified Ring as the shooter. However, under Arizona law at that time, a referee alone was required to determine the armorial bearing or absence of aggravating factors for imposition of the end penalty.         During the sentencing pha se, the judge heard testimony from one of Ri! ngs accomplices who placed exclusively the appoint on Ring. He said that Ring had non unaccompanied planned out the... If you want to get a teeming essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay